Agentic Evaluation Harness Services
Reviewed by Umar Abbas • CTO & Principal AI Architect
An agentic evaluation harness is an automated testing framework designed to evaluate multi-step agent trajectories, tool-calling precision, and final response accuracy across diverse prompt benchmarks. We engineer custom LLM-as-a-judge evaluators, synthetic dataset generators, and CI/CD regression gates using Ragas and DeepEval.
Automated Trajectory Evaluation Pipeline
Continuous Agent Evaluation Pipeline
Interactive Flow Diagram
Text alternative for screen readers & search engines
| Step | Stage Name | Function & Detail | Metrics / SLA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | N/A | ||
| 2 | N/A | ||
| 3 | N/A | ||
| 4 | N/A | ||
| 5 | N/A |
PyTest Trajectory Evaluation Suite
import pytest
from deepeval.metrics import GEval
from deepeval.test_case import LLMTestCase
trajectory_correctness_metric = GEval(
name="Trajectory Correctness",
criteria="Evaluate whether the agent executed minimum required tools without redundant calls.",
evaluation_params=[LLMTestCaseParams.INPUT, LLMTestCaseParams.ACTUAL_OUTPUT, LLMTestCaseParams.TOOLS_CALLED]
)
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_agent_account_lookup_trajectory():
agent_output = await run_test_agent("Find ledger summary for ACC-99201")
test_case = LLMTestCase(
input="Find ledger summary for ACC-99201",
actual_output=agent_output.final_text,
tools_called=agent_output.tool_history
)
trajectory_correctness_metric.measure(test_case)
assert trajectory_correctness_metric.score >= 0.95Benchmark Trajectory Test Coverage Calculator
Automated Test Suite Coverage vs Defect Mitigation
Live CalculatorText alternative for screen readers & search engines
At baseline baseline volume of 50,000 Test Cases: Legacy execution cost: $2,000/mo ($0.04/unit). Optimized architecture cost: $400/mo ($0.008/unit). Net monthly cost savings: $1,600/mo (80% cost reduction).
1,200 CI Build Executions Telemetry
Frequently Asked Questions
What metrics does an agentic evaluation harness measure?↓
We measure trajectory step efficiency, tool-calling precision, schema compliance, hallucination rates, and end-to-end task completion accuracy.
How do you run agent evaluation tests in GitHub Actions?↓
We build PyTest test suites that invoke isolated mock tool servers and run trajectory assertions against static benchmark datasets during git pull requests.
Is LLM-as-a-judge deterministic enough for CI/CD gates?↓
We combine deterministic schema validators for tool outputs with calibrated judge models running at zero temperature across 5 evaluation runs.
How long does it take to implement an agent evaluation harness?↓
Harness setup and benchmark dataset curation take 3 to 6 weeks, including CI/CD integration and regression dashboard deployment.
Who owns the test datasets and evaluation harness code?↓
Your engineering team holds 100% ownership of all evaluation scripts, test cases, and CI pipeline configurations.
Build Automated QA Harnesses for AI Agents
Consult with CTO Umar Abbas to set up continuous agent regression testing.
Request QA Architecture Review